The answer is C. Solar energy; I would save money in the long run.
While wind energy is a renewable and clean source of power, the initial investment for wind turbines can be quite high. Additionally, the efficiency of wind energy depends on the wind conditions in the area, which may not be consistent in all parts of Texas. Maintenance and the need for a significant amount of land can also be drawbacks.
Coal is indeed a relatively cheap source of energy, but it is also one of the most polluting. The environmental impact of coal, including greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, makes it a less desirable option, especially in the context of increasing awareness and concern about climate change.
Solar energy is a sustainable and environmentally friendly option. The cost of solar panels has decreased significantly over the years, and Texas, with its abundant sunshine, is an ideal location for solar power. While the initial setup cost can be high, the long-term savings on electricity bills and potential incentives or tax credits make it a cost-effective choice over time.
Natural gas is a cleaner fossil fuel compared to coal, and it is relatively cheap and abundant in Texas. However, it is still a non-renewable resource and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. While it may be a practical short-term solution, it does not offer the same long-term sustainability as renewable sources like solar energy.
Nuclear energy is indeed a proven and efficient technology with low greenhouse gas emissions during operation. However, the high cost of building and maintaining nuclear plants, along with concerns about nuclear waste disposal and safety, make it less feasible for individual home use, especially in a remote, rural setting.