The experiment setup described in the question seems to be a form of a rating scale, likely used to measure a certain attribute or response from participants. The scale ranges from "Moderately Low" to "Extremely High," with specific numerical ranges assigned to each category.
The answer is subjective and depends on individual experiences and perceptions.
The setup of the experiment, as described, does not seem particularly surprising. Rating scales are a common method in psychological and social science research to quantify subjective experiences or opinions. The numerical ranges assigned to different qualitative categories help in standardizing responses and making them easier to analyze.
This question addresses the potential for response bias, where participants might alter their answers to fit perceived expectations or to achieve a desired outcome. This is a common issue in self-reported data. Whether or not a participant feels tempted to choose contrary to their true thoughts can depend on several factors, including the perceived importance of the results, the clarity of the instructions, and the participant's understanding of the purpose of the experiment.
For example, in a study measuring self-esteem, a participant might feel tempted to choose higher ratings to appear more confident, even if they do not genuinely feel that way. This is known as social desirability bias.
In conclusion, the setup of the experiment using a rating scale is standard practice, and the temptation to alter responses can vary among participants based on individual motivations and the context of the experiment.