Homework Questions and Answers
for All Subjects

Here, you can freely access questions and answers from various subjects.
Our goal is to assist all learners in need. It is constantly being updated.

New Questions

Homework Question 8, 3.2.25-T Part 5 of 6 HW Score: 95.51%, 12.42 of 13 points Points: 0.67 of 1 Save The accompanying data represent the weights (in grams) of a random sample of 48 MM plain candies. Complete parts (a) through (f). Click the icon to view the weights of the MM plain candies. (a) Determine the sample standard deviation weight. 0.036 gram(s) (Round to three decimal places as needed.) (b) On the basis of the accompanying histogram, comment on the appropriateness of using the Empirical Rule to make any general statements about the weights of MMs. A. The histogram is approximately bell-shaped so the Empirical Rule can be used. B. The histogram is not approximately bell-shaped so the Empirical Rule cannot be used. C. The histogram is not approximately bell-shaped so the Empirical Rule can be used. D. The histogram is approximately bell-shaped so the Empirical Rule cannot be used. (c) Use the Empirical Rule to determine the percentage of MMs with weights between 0.803 and 0.947 gram. Hint: x̄=0.875. 95% (Type an integer or decimal. Do not round.) (d) Determine the actual percentage of MMs that weigh between 0.803 and 0.947 gram, inclusive. 95.8% (Round to one decimal place as needed.) (e) Use the Empirical Rule to determine the percentage of MMs with weights more than 0.911 gram. % (Type an integer or decimal. Do not round.) MM Candy Weights 0.87 0.90 0.91 0.86 0.90 0.93 0.87 0.88 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.87 0.86 0.84 0.82 0.84 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.87 0.90 0.81 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.93 0.86 0.84 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.84 0.89 0.93 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.95 0.86 0.85 0.79 0.91 0.88 0.87
Utalii Hotel records its cash and bank transactions in a triplecolumn cash book. The following transactions were performed by the company during the month of June 2018. - Jun 01: Cash in hand 800,000 (debit balance), Cash at bank 3,365,000 (debit balance). - Jun 03: Paid James Co. by check 1,175,000, discount received from him 25. - Jun 05: Received from David Co. a check amounting to 990,000 discount allowed to him 10,000. - Jun 07: Deposited into bank the check received from David Co. - Jun 10: Purchased stationary for cash, 170,000. - Jun 15: Purchased merchandise for cash, 1,280,000. - Jun 15: Cash sales for the first half of the month, 2,450,000. - Jun 16: Deposited into bank 1,250,000. - Jun 18: Withdrawn from bank for personal expenses 100,000. - Jun 19: Issued a check amounting to 1,630,000 to James Co. and discount received from him 20,000. - Jun 21: Drew from bank for office use, 420,000. - Jun 24: Received a check amounting to 1,435,000 from Henry Co. and allowed him a discount of 15,000. The Henry's check was deposited into bank immediately. - Jun 25: Paid a check to Jacob Inc. amounting to 385,000 and received a discount of 15,000. - Jun 27: Bought furniture for cash for office use, 380,000. - Jun 29: Paid office rent by check, 350,000. - Jun 30: Cash sales for the second half of the month 4,550,000. - Jun 30: Paid salaries by check 760,000. - Jun 30: Withdrew from bank for office use 470,000. Required: 1. Record the above transactions in cash book of Hotel Utalii and balance the cash and bank columns of the cash book.
Table 1 shows that a larger number of men than women had not visited a dentist or dental hygienist for the past 2 years. Also, compared with people with no SDI, more people in the severe SDI category had not visited a dentist or dental hygienist for >2 years (table 3). A similar pattern was observed for people living alone, with low occupational status, inactive in the labour market or with low educational achievement compared with those cohabiting or with higher occupational status with high educational achievement. Multiple logistic regression models (table 3) show significantly increased odds for lack of access to dental care services in relation to SDI. Self-reported oral health Table 1 indicates that there were no sex-specific differences in self-rated oral health. However, middle-aged men were more likely to report poorer oral health than younger men. We found living alone, low education, low occupational status or being inactive in the labour market to be associated with poor oral health in both men and women. Unhealthy lifestyle factors were associated with poor oral health, particularly daily smoking. We found a dose-response association between increasing levels of SDI and poor oral health (table 4). After adjusting for age, men with mild SDI and those with severe SDI had 2.7 -fold (95% CI 2.5 to 3.0) and 6.8 -fold (95% CI 6.2 to 7.5) increased odds for self-rated poor health compared with those with no SDI, respectively. The corresponding odds among women were 2.3 (95% Cl 2.1 to 2.5) and 6.8 (95% Cl 6.3 to 7.5); (table 4).